Case Information Biases Evaluations of Video-Recorded Eyewitness Identification Evidence
Publication Title
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Document Type
Article
Department or Program
Psychology
Publication Date
2024
Keywords
cognitive bias, evaluator accuracy, eyewitness identifications, video recording
Abstract
Video-recorded eyewitness identification procedures have heretofore unexamined potential for assisting evaluators in assessing eyewitness accuracy. In Study 1 (N = 240), evaluators, on average, successfully differentiated accurate from inaccurate witnesses based on videos of identification procedures alone, but not when extraneous incriminating evidence was also provided. Study 2 (N = 433) replicated this effect using different stimulus videos and operationalizations of evidence. Study 3 (N = 957) revealed that instructions highlighting the limitations of forensic evidence did not preserve evaluators’ ability to discern accuracy when extraneous incriminating case evidence was provided. Moreover, case information affected other judgments (e.g., perceptions of the witness’s view). Overall, results indicate that evaluators can differentiate between accurate and inaccurate witnesses, simply based on a video record of the identification procedure, bolstering recommendations to record identification procedures. However, these evaluations lose their utility when evaluators know about other case evidence.
Recommended Citation
Douglass, A. B., Charman, S. D., Matuku, K. P., Shambaugh, L. J., Lapar, M. P., & Lamere, E. (2024). Case Information Biases Evaluations of Video-Recorded Eyewitness Identification Evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 13(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000126
Comments
Original version is available from the publisher at: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000126