Department or Program

Environmental Studies

Abstract

Boston’s climate plans reproduce and aestheticize a model of resilience that relies on pre-identified vulnerability and capital-driven greening. In doing so, they obscure the role that green infrastructure plays in displacement, and use visual and rhetorical strategies to mask the politics embedded in these developments. “Achieving optimal levels of distributive justice without procedural justice is challenging,” yet this is precisely what Boston’s resilience efforts have attempted (Van Den Berg et al). This exposes the contradictions between visual renderings of inclusion and the realities of exclusion and reflects a broader failure to treat vulnerability, justice, and climate adaptation as interdependent, evolving, and deeply political. Analyzing these reports not as objective representations of climate change and climate action, but as images, maps, artifacts, and technologies that circulate and reinforce path dependencies allows us to unveil the hidden politics and interests of Boston’s climate resilience approach.

Level of Access

Restricted: Campus/Bates Community Only Access

First Advisor

Sonja Pieck

Date of Graduation

5-2025

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Number of Pages

67

Restricted

Available to Bates community via local IP address or Bates login.

Share

COinS