Europe's Malaise: Insights From Comparative and Historical Social Science
Publication Title
Research in Political Sociology
Document Type
Article
Department or Program
Sociology
Publication Date
2020
Keywords
European Union, Identity, State formation, Sovereignty, Nationalism, Populism
Abstract
How should we make sense of Europe's current malaise? Focused on the great recession, the European Union (EU)'s architecture, or diverging national interests, the literature offers useful economic, institutional, and political explanations. It is our contention that, however diverse, these works share one important limitation: a tendency to focus on rather immediate causes and consequences and not to step back with historical or comparative perspectives to gain a “longer” view of the dynamics at work. In this article, we begin by examining parallels between the EU's current conditions and the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. Then, introducing the articles contained in this special issue, we raise research questions pertaining to long-term historical, social, cultural, economic, and political factors. Are the current challenges unprecedented or do they have roots or connections to past events and developments? Is there a European trajectory into which we can contextualize current events? Are there bright spots, and what do they suggest about Europe's present and future? To engage in such questions, the papers leverage the insights of historical and comparative sociology, as well as comparative politics. In so doing, they offer analyses that see the EU as an instance of state formation. They propose that a key dimension of tension and possible resolution is the classic problem of sovereignty. They grapple with the question of identity and institutions, exploring in that context the extent and limit of citizens' support for more Europe. And they delve into the nature of the nationalist and populist sentiments within and across European countries.
Recommended Citation
Duina, Francesco and Frédéric Mérand. 2020. "Europe's Malaise: Insights From Comparative and Historical Social Science." Research in Political Sociology 27: 1-16.
Comments
Original version is available from the publisher at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0895-993520200000027001