Department or Program

Philosophy

Abstract

Testimonial injustice occurs when hearers discredit speakers on the basis of perceived identity features and associated assumptions about reliability. Unwarranted credibility denial derives from and reinforces the oppressive power dynamics structuring contemporary society. This thesis examines testimonial exchange within a framework of moral obligation, interpersonal wronging, and accountability. I conclude that testimonial injustice represents a violation of the speaker’s dignity as an authoritative issuer of moral demands. By highlighting universal duties with respect to testimony, and separating them from questions of belief, I arrive at a method for protecting speakers from being silenced, discredited, or dismissed.

Level of Access

Restricted: Embargoed [Bates Community After Expiration]

First Advisor

Schofield, Paul

Date of Graduation

5-2020

Degree Name

Bachelor of Science

Number of Pages

72

Embargoed

Available to Bates Community via local IP address or Bates login on Monday, April 08, 2030.

Share

COinS