Department or Program
Politics
Abstract
In popular discourse, emotion is often considered antithetical to the supposed informed and fair decision making that characterizes law. Nonetheless, scholarship across psychology, sociology, legal studies, and political science demonstrate how emotions influence decision making, including jury decision making, as well as other forms of individual and social action. Consequently, it follows that lawyers may appeal to different types of emotion when constructing arguments and narratives for juries. Do attorneys strategically influence juries’ emotions in order to receive a favorable verdict? Whether lawyers utilize emotion to trigger certain outcomes is understudied. Indeed, federal rules constrain these types of appeals during jury trials. Nevertheless, existing studies offer a methodology to interpret trial transcripts to identify, code, and evaluate emotional appeals. Some existing scholarship demonstrates how trial transcripts reveal identifiable patterns in lawyers’ emotional appeals to juries. By conducting content analysis on eighteen jury trial transcripts from murder cases, while also incorporating confirmation from four interviews with practicing criminal attorneys, this thesis presents trends in how lawyers attempt to trigger angry and sympathetic emotional responses from juries. While limits to this approach are noted—including that emotions are hardly singular and thus coding can be difficult and trial transcripts are not often readily accessible—grappling with how emotions may be manipulated in the courtroom by attorneys remains important especially as the subject is relatively unexplored beyond mock-jury experiments. Findings may uncover and potentially legitimize attorney emotional appeals in the courtroom. This thesis accordingly offers a starting point for the underdeveloped study of emotion in the law.
Level of Access
Open Access
First Advisor
Engel, Stephen
Date of Graduation
5-2022
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Recommended Citation
Lambert, Elise Marie, "Emotion in the Neutral Court: Attorney Appeals to Emotion in Jury Trial Argumentation" (2022). Honors Theses. 407.
https://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/407
Number of Pages
153
Components of Thesis
1 pdf file
Open Access
Available to all.