Department or Program
Philosophy
Abstract
In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls argues that, in constructing the basic structure of a just society, any social and economic inequalities must be part of a scheme of cooperation that works to the benefit of the least advantaged social class. He calls this principle of distributive justice the difference principle. In A Law of Peoples, however, he backs away from this claim, arguing for weaker cosmopolitan duties in constructing an international social order. This thesis does two things. 1.) It explores this tension in Rawls’s work, arguing that in order for the Law of Peoples to be consistent with A Theory of Justice, Rawls must embrace a global difference principle. 2.) It then investigates the implications of this conclusion, arguing that a global difference principle would necessitate robust duties of cosmopolitan aid, but would necessitate neither a world government nor open borders.
Level of Access
Open Access
First Advisor
Cummiskey, David
Date of Graduation
Spring 5-2013
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Recommended Citation
Fetrow, Kate L., "Towards Global Justice: Reconciling Rawlsian Liberalism and Cosmopolitanism in an Interconnected World" (2013). Honors Theses. 79.
https://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/79
Number of Pages
100
Components of Thesis
1 PDF file
Open Access
Available to all.